Actually, talking of rights and responsibilities, I think the mantra should be ' no conservation without responsibility' or ' no conservation without a financially viable capital and revenue funding strategy'.

Having thought about it all a bit more today, I have been wondering exactly what is being celebrated about the history of Louise House, as it surely was not the best time to be a working class or simply poor child. Whatever the spin on links with eminent academics, it appears to be very simply a monument to child abuse and child slavery. It cannot have provided the best experience for its residents. It would be interesting to hear from anyone who has personal or second hand experience of it.

Brian, when you say 'TB', I assume you mean Tony Blair and not tuberculosis.....