Nasaroc,
I said "The sad truth is that by listing Louise House (however important a building), it will put more pressure on the pools frontage to be demolished if there is to be two pools, dry leisure, and housing on the site."
I do not see how you read this as me being actively in favour of the demolition of the pools frontage - I would still like to see if there is a way this can be done and which Lewisham is willing to commit the finance to achieve. But we have to be reailistic about what the options are if we want swimming on the site.

You could well be right that there is room for two pools and leisure behind the facade and on to the pocket park, but I do not believe this will leave much room for housing. This would create a financial gap which will make it harder to get the leisure facilities required. Whatever happens I suspect that more money will need to be found to deliver the leisure facilities and I am not sure where this money will come from.

What we need now are some sensible costed plans for what can be built on the site with all options up for consideration.