Seems to be some confusion here. The No Demolition Without Design Petition stopped weeks ago - once the Council conceded that there would be no demolition until their 3 designs were consulted on in the summer consultation.

I was referring to the recent Save the Face of Forest Hill petition which is entirely consistent with a request to list Louise House as it states:

We, the undersigned, reject Options 1,2 and 3 of the Council's proposed designs. We wish to see the retention of the Pool's frontage block and Louise House and that these significant local landmark buildings be retained as part of the new pools complex.

People may not agree with this [ though clearly quite a few do] but it isn't unclear or inconsistent with listing. Clearly the choices have now changed but given Louise House will now be retained [and could be turned into flats if housing for cross-subsidly is really wanted by people] there are surely still two options demolish everything else and build new or keep frontage and incorporate into new. That is something worth consulting on and I guess even those who want the pools demolished would like some say in what replaces it.