I'm not sure the planning process has to start again for this sort of revision, but the planning officer should be asking serious questions about the design and access statement. He should also be looking for answers as to why there is no analysis of the impact of the building on adjacent properties, particularly no 49, and where any more cars will park now not a single one can be parked on the street in front of the property. Hopefully he is also asking whether this is the right location to allow the building of what are now even less desirable flats - even if they do have a bit more communal garden.