The fact that someone has exercised the right to invoke a covenant makes it easier for others to do so and harder for people to say they forgot it was there. Now everyone knows that these covenants exist and might choose to invoke others. I have to say I would still like someone to explain to me why its not ok for Piplings to run a business and its ok for next door to do so. The concept of nuisance or not is not relevant to this- its purely whether a covenant exists or not, and if not, is it in law not unfair for this rule to be applied to some properties by the covenant beneficiaries, and not to others who don't have a covenant in their title.

The position remains that all businesses subject to such an RC remain vulnerable to similar actions which can be brought about at any time by the relevant benficiaries as and when they feel like doing so. Sorry if that appears 'silly'.