My point is that they appear to be acting outside the stated constitution, with invented conditions. I suspect they believe they would get a more favourable voting outcome if its based on Households rather than Members.

So husbands and wives or partners of differing opinions only get 1 vote?

The resident's association is greater than its committee.

There are many fine professional people across the hill who are perfectly capable of carrying out the roles of the current committee members if those members really do insist on resigning. It's not the responsibility of those who are concerned about matters enough to request an SGM, to staff the positions - that's just daft.

The presence of the Resident's Association is very important and it must persist and we both are supportive of it - however it must be fair, open & representative - something we both feel the committees of the last 2 years have been anything but, in our experience.

This post was last modified: 02-03-2012 09:31 PM by piplingtoo.