@ Piplingtoo

It appears to me that there is indeed a concerted effort to unseat the present committee of TLERA. Many residents on the hill have been, for the most part, unaware of Piplings until recently. Why would they be, if not having children of nursery going age or living in the immediate vicinity. Also, we haven’t until recently been aware of the activities of the TLERA in connection with Piplings. No doubt this will be made clear at the meeting. I cannot speak for the general population on the hill, but I believe that most are not against the nursery, per se. It is clearly a well run business providing a much needed service to those needing places for their children. It has been proved not to be a nuisance to the neighbours in general. It appears that the parties are Piplings, and a (?) neighbour (supported by TLERA??). Nobody else. I sincerely hope, having been on the wrong side of serious litigation myself, that a compromise can be found. Else it is going to be very expensive for one or other party, or all involved. My real concern is that two community fora have been exploited, together with the press and radio to paint the residents of the hill as a whole as rather unpleasant people. As a result a SGM has been triggered with a confidence vote attached, which could, if it turns out that way, mean the loss of an association that has looked after the interests of this neighbourhood for half a century or more. This will not resolve the matter between the parties. It will just leave us with no residents association.

@ rshdunlop

So that’s why my eyesight is getting a bit ropey. No carbolic!

The terms “Royston Vasey” and “Zimbabwe on the Hill”, however, did not emanate from the EDF (Vide previous posts)