Not exaggerating anything. Just pointing out how weak the initial case was, which apparently is grounds for a libel action. I see you're now developing it from OMG ALCOHOL NO OMG!!! which is to be welcomed. I never knew there were so many puritans in Forest Hill. Had you waited a little while and actually put some thought into it, you might not have needed to hang your objections on something that always smacked of being deeply insincere. I still think the deliveries argument is highly speculative, and that you should base any objections to it on what Morrisons actually say, rather than 'well, some bloke on the forum says they'll need a lorry there two or three times a day, backing into the next street, and there's no way they'll park outside the gym, no.'

'Equally damaging?'. Don't be silly. The existing Temples of Fiction and Homophobia in Forest Hill cause parking chaos on Sundays - try walking from the pools to the station. It's not only planning laws that are ignored. This one would just make things ridiculous. Ask the people in Crystal Palace whether they'd rather have a little Morrisons than what they've got.

I'm also fed up with the 'what we need' argument and WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A FISHMONGERS! This isn't how these things work.